<div style="background-color: none transparent;"><a href="http://www.rsspump.com/?web_widget/rss_ticker/news_widget" title="News Widget">News Widget</a></div>

The Linguistic Legacy of American Politics

by Rich Rubino on May 15, 2013

For all the legacies that American politics has bequeathed to the world, one that rarely gets acclaim is its linguistic legacy. Many words that originated from American politics have permeated our general lexicon.

One would be hard pressed to complete a day without multiple uses of the word “OK,” not just in the United States but also around the world. Martin Van Buren was nicknamed “Old Kinderhook” simply because he hailed from Kinderhook, N.Y. Van Buren became known as “OK” for short. During his 1840 reelection campaign, his supporters created “OK clubs.” Although the expression OK had been around for some time, Van Buren’s campaign popularized the expression. Van Buren’s political adversaries mendaciously claimed that OK originated from his predecessor and ally Andrew Jackson. They alleged that Jackson was a poor speller, and that Jackson believed that OK was the abbreviation for “all correct.”

Origins of the word “booze.” Van Buren’s major opponent in the 1840 presidential campaign was William Henry Harrison. Harrison’s campaign gave the world a new term and a new saying. Whisky distiller E.G. Booze promoted Harrison’s campaign by selling whisky in log cabin-shaped bottles. The term booze became synonymous with whisky. Also in that campaign, Harrison supporters rolled a 10-foot globe from one campaign rally to the next to the chant of “Keep the Ball Rolling.” Hence was born a popular expression. Ironically, the linguistic legacy of the Harrison campaign trumped any legacy of the Harrison presidency. Unfortunately, Harrison died of pneumonia just 32 days into his term.

“The first lady.” President Zackary Taylor coined the term “first lady” while delivering a eulogy at the funeral service for Dolly Madison. Taylor said of Madison: “She will never be forgotten, because she was truly our first lady for a half-century.”

In 2000, after conceding the presidential election to Texas Governor George W. Bush, Vice President Al Gore told the American people he would “mend some fences literally and figuratively in Tennessee.” U.S. Treasury Secretary John Sherman coined this phrase in 1879. He told an audience in his native Mansfield, Ohio: “I have come home to look after my fences.” While Sherman likely meant that he was coming home to look after the fences on his farm, the line came to mean that he was trying to consolidate political support in his home state.

John Sherman was not the only member of his family to add to the American lexicon. In 1884, there was an active effort by some Republican Party activists to draft former Civil War General William Tecumseh Sherman to seek the Republican nomination for President. Sherman stated definitively: “I will not accept if nominated and will not serve if elected.” This unequivocal language left no wiggle room for Sherman to explore a candidacy. This absolute language is today called a “Shermanesque statement.” When an individual says he/she will not run for a certain office, reporters often ask if the candidate will make a “Shermanesque statement” that they will not run.

The term “teddy bear” was named after President Theodore Roosevelt. In 1902, the president accepted an initiation by Mississippi Governor Andrew H. Longino to join a bear hunting expedition in the Mississippi Delta. The president had an unsuccessful hunting trip. The nationally acclaimed hunter Holt Collier was one of the guests on the trip. He was also serving as an animal tracker for the president. Collier managed to captured a bear cub, and instead of shooting it, he hit the cub on the head with his rifle, and tied it to a tree. He wanted the president to shoot it so the president could boast of a successful hunting trip. When Roosevelt saw the little bear, he refused to shoot it, arguing that it would not be a fair fight. Political cartoonist Clifford Berryman got word of the episode and published a cartoon of Roosevelt declining to shoot the bear. Ever the opportunists, candy store proprietors Morris and Rose Michtom made a stuffed bear and coined it “Teddy’s bear.” It is now simply called “teddy bear.”

The term “goody-goody” was originally coined in the 1890s as a term of derision for “good government guys,” or “goo-goos.” These “goody-goodies” were politicians who supported government reform and an end to government graft and corruption.

In 1916, rising star U.S. Senator Warren G. Harding (R-OH) delivered the keynote address at the Republican National Convention. In that address, he popularized the term “Founding Fathers.” Although Harding had uttered the phrase in front of a local audience, this was the first time he had used the phrase in addressing a national audience. Harding was elected President in 1920, and used the term “Founding Fathers” in his 1921 inaugural address.

The term “Cold War,” describing the rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union after WWII, was coined by financier Bernard Baruch in 1947 at the unveiling of his portrait in the South Carolina House of Representatives. Baruch was a native South Carolinian, and when using the term Cold War was referring to relations between management and labor. In that speech, Baruch intoned: “Let us not be deceived — we are today in the midst of a cold war. Our enemies are to be found abroad and at home.” The media began using Baruch’s term to refer to the relationship between the Soviet Union and the United States, a war not fought on the battlefield.

“The GOP.” Today, the acronym GOP (which stands for Grand Old Party) is synonymous with the Republican Party. The term has an interesting history. In fact, the acronym was originally used by the Democratic Party. It was coined by a loyal Georgia Democrat in 1878. The term became synonymous with the Republican Party after the 1888 presidential election, in which Republican Benjamin Harrison defeated incumbent Democratic president Grover Cleveland. The Chicago Tribune, sympathetic to the Republican Party, declared: “Let us be thankful that under the rule of the Grand Old Party… these United States will resume the onward and upward march which the election of Grover Cleveland in 1884 partially arrested.”

GOBBLEDYGOOK! The term “gobbledygook” was coined by former U.S. Representative Maury Maverick (D-TX 1935-1939). Maverick was serving as the head of the United States Smaller War Plants Corporation during WWll. Maverick had little forbearance for technocratic language that he could not understand. Accordingly, Maverick wrote a memorandum to his employees saying: “Stay off the gobbledygook language. It only fouls people up. For Lord’s sake, be short and say what you’re talking about … anyone using the words ‘activation’ or ‘implementation’ will be shot.” The word “gobbledygook” was the brainchild of Maverick, imitating the noise a turkey makes.

A “Sister Souljah Moment.” An unlikely American whose name has become part of American parlance is rapper Sister Souljah. In her single, “The Final Solution: Slavery’s Back in Effect,” Souljah says: “If black people kill black people every day, why not have a week and kill white people?” Souljah was invited to address the Rainbow PUSH Coalition run by Civil Rights activist Jesse Jackson. Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton, the likely presidential nominee for the Democratic Party, addressed the audience. Clinton told the crowd: “If you took the words ‘white’ and ‘black,’ and you reversed them, you might think David Duke (Former KKK Grand Wizard and Louisiana Gubernatorial candidate) was giving that speech.” This was a political masterstroke in that it distanced himself from Jackson, who was seen as a liberal ideologue by many centrist voters who Clinton was assiduously cultivating. In addition, there was no discernable deleterious electoral impact regarding Clinton’s support from the Democratic base. A “Sister Souljah Moment” now refers to any political candidate who challenges their own base with the intent of winning centrist voters.

The above words and expressions are just a few of the linguistic contributions American politics has given to the world. Although these words are used freely today without much thought, the words were quite bizarre when originated. “OK.” Enough of this “gobbledygook!”

{ 0 comments }

Throughout American history there have been many instances of resolutions passing the U.S. Congress almost unanimously but for a few dissenting votes, occasionally even a single vote. While viewed as mavericks in their own time, these lone voters have sometimes been vindicated by history, despite the contemporaneous political fallout.

In 1937, U.S. Representative Maury Maverick (D-TX) was the only Southern Democrat to vote for federal legislation disallowing lynching. Congressman Maverick stated: “I think it’s time that the South as well as the North condemn lynching.” This proved to be a politically lethal statement for a Southerner to make at the time. Despite the fact that history vindicated Maverick’s once unpopular position on this issue, his position did not sit well within his congressional district and he was voted out of office in the primary election.

Interestingly, independence is apparently in Maury Maverick’s gene pool. His grandfather was cattle rancher Samuel Maverick, who, because of his independent nature, caused Texans to label anyone who was independent-minded as a “maverick.”

In 1964, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to give President Lyndon B. Johnson a blank check to pursue military action in Southeast Asia. This abdication of Congressional authority allowed the president to escalate forces in Vietnam without coming before the U.S. Congress. The House passed the resolution without a solitary dissenting vote. As the drumbeat for war grew louder, two U.S. senators resisted the march to war, voting against the resolution. Wayne Morse (D-OR) admonished his colleagues for not officially declaring war as is mandated in the U.S. Constitution. Morse said: “I believe that within the next century, future generations will look with dismay and great disappointment upon a Congress that is now about to make such an historic mistake.” The other dissenter was Ernest Gruening (D-AK) who admonished that the resolution would result in the nation: “sending our American boys into combat in a war in which we have no business, which is not our war, into which we have been misguidedly drawn.” This view is now mainstream thinking when Americans look back at the Vietnam War. However, at the time, both senators were marginalized.

After the incalculable loss of blood and treasure in Vietnam, many members of Congress tried to atone for their votes for the Gulf or Tonkin Resolution. U.S. Representative Tip O’Neal (D-MA) later said that his vote for the resolution was the only vote he “regretted.” He said that while he had doubts at the time, he also believed that on national security matters he must support the president.

Sometimes standing alone can even result in death threats to a member of Congress. In 2001, after the September 11 hijackings, the U.S. Congress passed a resolution granting the president the authority “to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons.” At the time, support for an invasion of Afghanistan (whose government was harboring al Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden) was widely popular in the U.S. The only member of the U.S. Congress to vote against the resolution was U.S. Representative Barbara Lee (D-CA). Few Americans had analyzed the potential unintended consequences of giving the President the authority to send a secular Army into a Muslim nation, and the attendant blowback. In fact, the House approved the resolution after just five hours of debate on the floor. Lee stated at the time: “At least minimally, we should be able to know which nation we’re planning to attack and have some input into that. We should know what the exit strategy is.” Because of that vote, she received death threats, and the Capital Police Department dispatched officers to provide her with 24-hour protection. Today, the war in Afghanistan continues, and is the longest war in U.S. history. In addition, U.S. presence in Afghanistan continues to act as a recruiting magnet for al Qaeda and their coefficients.

In the aftermath of the 9/11 hijackings, the U.S. Congress passed the U.S.A. Patriot Act. Once again, the nation rallied around its leaders, and had little forbearance for talk of civil liberties. Ironically, the legislation was not even available for members of the U.S. Congress to read prior to voting on it. The only dissenting vote in the U.S. Senate was Russell Feingold (D-WI). While Feingold supported many provisions of the Act, he objected to the greatly expanded surveillance power of the federal government. Though it received de minimis attention at the time, the Act provided law enforcement with the authority to enter a private residence without receiving the permission of the homeowner. While the provision was placed in the legislation under the auspices of fighting terrorism, the preponderant use of these warrants has been applied to unrelated drug cases. Today, certain provisions of The Patriot Act are opposed across the political spectrum, and Feingold’s position is no longer on the fringe.

In 2012, the U.S. Congress overwhelmingly passed a resolution imposing harsh sanctions upon Iran. The sanctions were sold to the American people as a way to destabilize the Iranian regime and to force Iran to cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in its investigation of an alleged nuclear program. Only six members of the U.S. House of Representatives voted against the resolution. They were U.S. Representatives Justin Amash (R-MI), John Duncan (R-TN), Tim Johnson (R-Ill), Walter Jones (R-NC) Ron Paul (R-TX) and Dennis Kucinich (D-OH).

The sanctions are debilitating Iran’s economy. The nation’s currency, called the rial, has dropped about 80 percent in value, making it hard for Iranians to procure necessities. Unfortunately, the sanctions provide an expedient scapegoat for the Iranian government: They can blame the U.S. Government for their economic problems. Moreover, the sanctions can inadvertently be providing an additional recruiting magnet for al-Qaeda. In the end, it is possible that the unpopular votes cast by the aforementioned U.S. House members will be vindicated over time.

It is always easy to vote with the majority, especially when the vote is near unanimous. The few dissenters often suffer political heat and are excoriated and ridiculed as gadfly’s in the political process, and are usually marginalized as well. However, sometimes history has proven that these dissenters had great foresight. As 1952 and 1956 Democratic presidential nominee Adlai E. Stevenson reminds us: “All progress has resulted from people who took unpopular positions.”

{ 0 comments }

Barack Obama: A Socialist He Is Definitely Not

April 24, 2013

Critics of Barack Obama often label him as a socialist, a term of derision in American politics. Socialism is viewed by many Americans as an extreme brand of liberalism. Accordingly, as a political tactic, Republicans try to tether Democrats to this label, just as Democrats try their best, equally unfairly, to tether Republicans to the [...]

Read the full article →

Has the U.S. Presidency Become Monarchical?

April 12, 2013

he president is referred to as the leader of our country, and the leader of the free world. Few Americans give that phrase a second thought. This is exactly what some delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia feared. Edmond Randolph warned that the presidency was “The Foetus of Monarchy.” His fellow conventioneer, Patrick [...]

Read the full article →

The Miracle of Political Resurrections

March 29, 2013

Easter is upon us, a time when Christians celebrate their belief in the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead. In the political sphere, there are also resurrections. Politicians sometimes peak early in their career and then fall into the political abyss. Some then miraculously rise again. In 1824, at age 29, Democrat James K. [...]

Read the full article →

Non-Interventionism Is Making a Comeback Within the GOP and Rand Paul Is Its New Messenger

March 26, 2013

Mark Twain said that “history does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme.” He could very well have been talking about the revival of support for a non-interventionist foreign policy within the GOP. U.S. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has become a prominent voice within the Republican Party in support of non-intervention. He does not espouse [...]

Read the full article →

RINOs and DINOs: Although Faithful to their Parties’ Original Political Ideology, they get No Respect

March 19, 2013

The terms RINO (Republican in Name Only) and DINO (Democrat in Name Only) are used pejoratively by adherents of contemporary partisan orthodoxy to describe ideological outliers. Partisans often question why moderate and liberal Republicans and moderate and conservative Democrats identify with their respective parties. It is quite ironic that these political positions have come to [...]

Read the full article →

Chuck Hagel’s Vociferous Criticism of the Bush Administration Has Not Been Forgotten by His Former GOP Senate Colleagues

March 12, 2013

Chuck Hagel was recently confirmed by the Democratically-controlled U.S. Senate to be the 24th U.S. Secretary of Defense. He accomplished this with only four Republican votes in the U.S. Senate. It is no secret that Hagel has become persona non-grata among many of his former Republican Senate colleagues. However, it was not simply his opposition [...]

Read the full article →

Running for Governor of Massachusetts May Be a Smarter Option for Scott Brown Than Running for the U.S. Senate

March 5, 2013

Former U.S. Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) stunned the American political scene by announcing that he would not run in the special election to succeed John Kerry, who resigned his U.S. Senate seat to become Secretary of State. Brown was a rare Republican who was able to win a seat in heavily Democratic Massachusetts. He struck [...]

Read the full article →

THE ANNUAL STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS: PAGEANTRY OVER SUBSTANCE?

February 12, 2013

“Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of Congress, distinguished guests, my fellow Americans.” These words, or a slight variation of them, are spoken by the president to begin the annual State of The Union address. Today the annual State of the Union address is usually more political theater than substance. The House Sergeant-at-Arms bellows: “Mr. [...]

Read the full article →